Considering that the Canon EF 70-300 f/4-5.6L IS USM is half the price of this 100-400, it's a real shame DP Review don't seem to have a review of the 70-300. It's a slightly more practical zoom range, smaller, lighter, and at half the cost a very attractive product. Comparison of Canon EF 100mm f/2.0 USM and Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM based on specifications, reviews and ratings. We and our partners use cookies to give you the best online experience, including to personalise advertising and content. Canon EF 135mm f/2.0L USM Verdict. Despite its age, this classic lens still manages to hold its own against more modern competition, thanks to fantastic optical quality and build. Being priced at Tested side-by-side at 300mm in good light with targets at 3m and 15m, the Mk II averaged 0.4 secs to shift between the two, compared to the Mk I at 0.5 secs. These are very good times for the focal length, only getting slightly longer in lower light, with the Mk II lens hardly affected at all. The Canon 100-400mm Mk II also has a very close The device is protected with extra seals to prevent failures caused by dust, raindrops, and water splashes. Has a metal mount. Canon EF 100mm F/2 USM. Venus Optics Laowa 65mm f/2.8 2x Ultra Macro APO. A metal mount is generally superior to a plastic mount as it is more durable. weight. This includes the newest pair to join the growing stable of great glass – the RF Canon RF 100-400mm f/5.6-8 IS USM zoom and the wide-angle RF RF 16mm f/2.8 STM. What is the difference between Canon EF 100mm F/2 USM and Canon EF-S 60mm F/2.8 Macro USM? Find out which is better and their overall performance in the camera lens ranking. At f/1.8 compared to the Nikon Z 35 f/1.8, the Canon is noticeably brighter, maybe 1/3rd stop and the IQ is markedly better at the corners and edges. The Nikon doesn't catch up until f/4. Interestingly the Nikon has more magnification at distance, it seems the Canon is less than 35mm true FL, more like 30mm or the Nikon is more like 38-40mm. .

canon ef 100mm f 2.0 usm review